Mistrial denied in E Jean Carroll rape case while Trump visits Scotland – live

Mr Tacopina went on to mention Ms Carroll’s interview with fellow magazine writer and Trump accuser Natasha Stoynoff, saying Ms Carroll asked if Mr Trump had been “grinding” against her.

Trump’s lawyer argued that this suggested Carroll was witness coaching.

“I recognize what you are trying to do,” Judge Kaplan said, according to law and crime. “Her interpretation of what she wants to argue to the jury is that Ms. Carroll was trying to suggest that Ms. Stoynoff, in quotes, ‘remember’ that that happened.”

“She was trying to put words in the witness’s mouth,” he added.

It is “at least debatable that she asked three times,” since Ms. Stoynoff did not give a “straight answer,” Judge Kaplan said.

“I think he is allowed to go into that,” the judge said, adding that it must be in a timely manner and within the rules of evidence.

Tacopina based his mistrial request in part on Judge Kaplan’s comment on Jonathan Swift and his 1729 satirical essay. A modest proposal.

“I would not suggest that it is satire,” Judge Kaplan said Monday. “That seems to bother you.”

At this point, there was laughter in the courtroom.

The judge in the case of writer E Jean Carroll against former President Donald Trump has denied the former president’s request to declare a mistrial, CNN reported.

Trump had requested a mistrial in the civil assault and defamation trial he is facing against writer E Jean Carroll, citing the presiding judge’s “widespread unfair and prejudicial rulings” against him, CNN reported.

Trump’s attorney, Joe Tacopina, filed a letter early Monday morning saying he would, alternatively, ask Judge Lewis Kaplan to “correct the record of any and all cases in which the court has mischaracterized the facts of this case to the jury” or ask for greater leeway. on cross-examination of Ms. Carroll.

“Here, even though trial testimony has been ongoing for only two days, the proceedings are already replete with numerous explanations of the court’s unfair treatment of the defendant, most of which have been witnessed by the jury.” the letter said.

Mr Tacopina asked Ms Carroll if she was accusing former CBS boss Les Moonves of “going after you like an octopus while you have a boner”. in her book.

“You wrote that you were ‘poking,’” Mr. Tacopina pressed, to which Ms. Carroll said yes.

Asked if Mr Moonves denied the allegation, Ms Carroll said that he did so to NY magazine.

“He said it never happened,” he said.

“He just denied it. He didn’t grind my face in the mud like Donald Trump did,” she added.

Ms Carroll explained that she did not call the police after being assaulted, saying that she “was a member of the silent generation. I only called once. I was staying at a country house and the kids called Helen Hayes’ mailbox. I called the police because I thought they were messing it up.”

“So you would call the police for a mailbox, but not for being raped?” asked Mr. Tacopina, according to City Center Press.

“I wouldn’t call about something I was embarrassed about,” Carroll said.

“But in your column, did you advise readers to call the police?” said Mr. Tacopina, to which Ms. Carroll said that she was.

Former President Donald Trump has filed for a mistrial in his civil assault and defamation trial against writer E Jean Carroll, citing the presiding judge’s “widespread unfair and prejudicial rulings,” CNN reported.

Trump’s attorney, Joe Tacopina, filed a letter early Monday morning saying he would, alternatively, ask Judge Lewis Kaplan to “correct the record of any and all cases in which the court has mischaracterized the facts of this case to the jury” or ask for greater leeway. on cross-examination of Ms. Carroll.

“Here, even though trial testimony has been ongoing for only two days, the proceedings are already replete with numerous explanations of the court’s unfair treatment of the defendant, most of which have been witnessed by the jury.” the letter said.

Mr. Tacopina raised the fact that the judge prevented Mr. Tacopina from asking Ms. Carroll additional questions about her efforts to obtain security camera footage from the store, “expressing a corroborative opinion” that there was no nobody on the sixth floor of the Bergdorf Goodman store at the time of death. the alleged assault. Tacopina also criticized Judge Kaplan, calling certain lines of his questioning “argumentative” in front of the jury.

Following the objection against Mr. Tacopina’s line of questioning, a lawyer for Ms. Carroll told Judge Kaplan that “it is not appropriate for the jury to know of off-book assaults, even some on-book.”

“She testified before the 21 most horrible men, apparently not including all of the ones who apparently assaulted her,” Tacopina said.

Judge Kaplan asked why an answer on the assaults would be allowed, prompting Tacopina to withdraw the question.

“The book as a whole is not” part of the trial, a lawyer for Ms Carroll said, according to City Center Press.

The lawyer added that attacks by Ms Carroll’s ex-husband John Johnson and former CBS boss Les Moonves are part of the process.

After this discussion, the jury re-entered the courtroom.

Mr. Tacopina asked Ms. Carroll: “This Facebook post says, ‘Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000 if he couldn’t talk’? You joked about this, right?”

“You joked about having sexual relations with Mr. Trump five years earlier,” the lawyer added.

“Does your book have a list of horrible men?” asked Mr. Tacopina.

“It’s a dark satire,” Carroll responded.

“According to you, it doesn’t even include all the men you say assaulted her?” asked Mr. Tacopina.

This provoked an objection from Ms. Carroll’s legal team and the judge asked the jury to enter the jury room.

Ms Carroll said she was “impressed” by The newbie.

“Ambitious young businessmen competing, that’s what I liked. No [Mr Trump] firing people,” he said, according to City Center Press.

“But you posted that you were a big fan,” Tacopina pressed.

Ms. Carroll pointed out that two of her friends were on the show.

E Jean Carroll has returned to the witness stand as cross-examination by Trump attorney Joe Tacopina continues.

“Mrs. Carroll, did you continue to shop at Bergdorf’s after the 1995 or 1996 event you describe?” the lawyer asked, according to the Inner City Press, to which Ms. Carroll said yes.

“Since 1995 or 1996, you have [made] How many purchases at Bergdorf’s? Mr. Tacopina pressed.

“Not necessarily many, but several,” Carroll said.

Mr. Tacopina asked if it was “fair to say you weren’t afraid to go to Bergdorf’s.”

“Right,” Carroll said.